I would prefer simple explanations, visualized on the car panel, accompanied by a sound/popup/notification and/or by an AI assistant speaking plainly.

Probably the middle ground, simple, understandable language for immediate warnings, which require immediate action. For more complicated issues, I would like to still have the plain language, but with the possibility of further explanation and "lengthy reading", if I wish to.

The sweet spot is plain language + reason. That tells you what's happening and why, so you stay mentally engaged rather than create cognitive load at the worst moment.

I would prefer a combination of both. Something like : “Lane drifting detected. Please correct steering. (System confidence: 85%)”

I would prefer simple explanations and maybe next to it a percentage of the likelihood of it (for example, just like the weather with rain). We shouldn't be distracted with too much information in cars

I prefer percentages, because a simple label like 'heavy rain' doesn't tell you how certain the system actually is. It's like checking the weather app : you don't just look at the rain icon, you check the percentage to know whether to actually bring an umbrella. A number gives you a sense of the risk level, so you can decide for yourself instead of just trusting the label blindly.

I prefer to have simple explanations with percentages for upcoming events,to be more predictable. It’s better this short information without brief description.

Simple explanation

I IMAGINE AN EXPLANATION W A PERCENTAGE WOULD BE HELPFUL

I prefer simple explanations. To me, the point is to get relevant information without disturbing the driving. Thus, technical percentages are useless and might be a nuisance.

I prefer complex explanations such as “heavy rain, AI confidence: 85%) so that I can acknowledge how likely it is that the system is right.

I prefer simple explanations like 'heavy rain'. When driving, I need to make split-second decisions, and clear language is faster to process than percentages

Personally , I would prefer simple explanations such as heavy rain , lane drifting etc.

I would definitely prefer clear explanation such as Heavy rain and Lane is drifting as it feels more human. I am not sure I would prefer percentages since these can change increasingly by time and It would keep me thinking of checking regularly if the information changes

I would prefer simple explanation combine both of them… but I think that heavy rain will be more easier to understand while driving

I would prefer technical percentages rather than absolute "guesses", cause it gives me the freedom to decide for my self on what is happening and why the AI might be thinking that i'm lane drifting or w.e. , for sure i still want to get notified about some event that is happening or might happen but i prefer the "Guess" is not absolute

I'd prefer the simplest possible explanation in the least distracting way. I don't really need an overabundance of information

I would prefer a combination of both. Simple language/ explanation and technical percentages to have the full information in order to correct what is needed.

I prefer simple explanations like “heavy rain” or “lane drifting” because they are easier and faster to understand while driving. It feels more natural, like human communication, and helps me react better. Adding the percentage as well, would be useful, because it gives an extra idea of how confident the AI is.

Simple explanations would be preferred as they help me understand what is happening and why the AI is warning me, without needing to interpret technical data. However, a small confidence indicator could also be useful because it reminds me that the AI is not perfect.I can use the warning as support, but still stay alert and make the final decision myself.

I prefer simple explanations because are easier to understand quickly while driving and help me react appropriately without being distracted by complex information. Knowing the reason behind a warning helps me assess the situation myself, while technical confidence scores can be difficult to interpret in real time.

I prefer simple explanations

I prefer simple explanations, with just a bit of technical details only where absolutely necessary.

Combination of simple explanation like heavy rain but followed with confidence level.

technical percentages

I prefer simple explanations, such as “heavy rain”, “lane drifting”, or “limited visibility”, supported by a clear uncertainty indicator when needed. Technical percentages can be useful for experts, but they may confuse drivers or create blind trust. The system should explain the reason in plain language and remind the driver that the final decision remains human.

Simple and to-the-point language accompanied by the percentage of accuracy of the prediction of the AI.

I would prefer simple explanations like “heavy rain” or “leaving the lane” instead of only technical percentages like “AI confidence: 85%.” Simple explanations help the driver understand the real danger quickly. A good system can show both, but the main message should be clear and practical. This communication style helps me trust the AI carefully, because I understand the reason for the warning instead of blindly trusting a number.

Simple explanations while driving.

I would like a combination of both, some simple language for immediate warnings

I would prefer simple explanations, with the option to ask AI for more information if needed.

I prefer simple explanations than the technical details.

I would prefer simple explanations to assist my drive. I believe percentages may distract driver and percentages information can be redundant.

I would prefer a layered explanation: start with a simple reason, then let me access technical details if I want them.

I prefer simple explanations because they are easier to understand quickly. Percentages alone do not help much, because I may not know what the AI is actually warning me about.

I would prefer simple explanations when the ai is almost 100% certain about something, otherwise I would prefer a longer explanation

I prefer simple explanations, but with a small detail, like “slippery road” or “car too close ahead.”
I do not want only numbers, because while driving I need to understand the danger immediately.

I definitely prefer simple phrases like "heavy rain." When I am driving, I cannot look at percentages and try to calculate what an 85% confidence level means. Clear words keep me focused on the road and let me make the final decision without guessing.

A mix works best for me. Give me a simple warning like "lane drifting" but show a small percentage next to it so I know how sure the AI is. This helps me understand the reason behind the alert and decide if it is a real emergency or just a system glitch.

Simple explanations are much better. Seeing "limited visibility" tells me exactly what the issue is immediately. Percentages are just confusing and distracting when you need to react fast, and they might lead to blindly trusting the car's judgment.

I like a layered approach. Show a simple alert first, and if I want to know more, let me access the technical details later when the car is stopped. This keeps me informed without overloading my brain with numbers while navigating heavy traffic.

Honestly, I like the percentages. Knowing the AI is 90% sure helps me judge its uncertainty and trust its judgment more. However, it should still include a quick phrase like "obstacle ahead" so I know what the threat actually is.

Simple words are the way to go. "Heavy rain" tells me exactly what to look out for. Technical percentages are too abstract for real-time driving decisions and might make me rely too much on the technology instead of my own eyes.

Simple explanations help the most because they are intuitive. If I see "lane drifting," I instantly check my position. Percentages require too much cognitive effort when split-second decisions and reactions matter on the highway.

I prefer a combination. Give me a quick plain-language warning, but add a small confidence metric. Understanding the reason behind the warning builds my trust, while the percentage lets me judge the AI's level of certainty.

Simple words like "limited visibility" are much better because they don't distract me from driving. Technical data belongs in a settings menu, not flashing on the screen while I am trying to navigate difficult road conditions.

I prefer simple warnings because they are fast to read. However, a small percentage can be helpful to show if the AI is confused about a situation. It helps me stay alert instead of just blindly trusting the car's sensors.

Simple explanations like "heavy rain" are essential for safety. Percentages are too abstract while driving and could cause drivers to hesitate or over-rely on what the computer thinks is happening outside.

A layered approach is best. A quick, simple warning on the main display, with the option to see detailed confidence percentages if I tap it later. This keeps the initial warning clean and easy to read at a glance.

Definitely simple words. They are intuitive and keep me grounded in the actual situation. Percentages can be misleading and might make me second-guess my own eyes while driving, which is highly dangerous.